法院文件-反驳他出庭前的恶毒诡辩36(2 / 2)
15)MAY14,called16times,sent6messages,andsent4emailstobothhispersonalandworkingemailaddressthatday.(SeeExhibit40)
16)MAY15,called24times,sent42messages,andsent2emailstobothhispersonalandworkingemailaddressthatday.Shewantedfinancialcompensation,askinghimtoanswerhercallsandmessages.(SeeExhibit40)
17)MAY15,sheemailedandmessaged(toolsimilartoZoom--Chime)atleast10ofhismanagersandcoworkers.Sheissayingthatheisasexualfraud.Shetellsthem:youaresexualfraud,yourbehaviorsharmedherandAmazon,shewantsanapology,shewantslossmadeup.SeetheemailinExhibit8(page13)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page2point6,10
2)Ionlysent1emailto5receipts,pluspetitionerhimself,withethesamerequestason04/27/2023,fearingthatKangDaimayfurtherdefamemyreputation,andduetohisthreatsonApril24,2023andthoseonlinedefamationwhichcausedmyseverefear,IbelievedthatKangDai’semployerasneutralthirdparty,shouldhavetheauthoritytomakeaninternalinvestigationandrevealthetruth.Becausehesaidhiscolleaguesallknewalready,andhissupervisorsareChinese,andinChineseculture,mangerandemployeecanmanagesuchtopicprivatelyandpeacefully.IdidnotreporthimtothepoliceasIwashopingtoresolvetheproblemsprivatelyandpeacefullywithKangDai.AmazonHRandhissurpervisorrepliedandpromisedwilltakecareofit.(SeeExhibit45,31)
3)Ididn’tsay“youaresexualfraud”-didn’tfindthisinemail
4)“yourbehaviorsharmedher”-yes,hisbehaviorharmedme,hehurtsmedeeplyemotionallyduetohisdeceptionandmanipulationinthepast7years.Hehurtsmedeeplyphysicallyduetohehadsexwithmeinmyperiodon02/10/2023,whichcausedmephysicalpainlastedtillnow.Hisbehaviorscausedmemaynottohavechildanymore
18)MAY16,
a.Shecalled2times,sent6messages
b.ShecreatedaChimechattingroom,namedisas“DaiKang-SexualFraud”,invitedhismanagersintotheroo
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17”
2)Iwonderedwhyhedidn’treplymeafterreadmymessage,IalsowonderedifthatishisChimeaccount.Soon05/16/2023,Iinvitedachatroomwithname“DK”.Buthestayedinthechatroom.Isent1message:“DaiKang,pleasedon’tavoidtheproblem.”On05/17/2023,Iadded“hismanagers”tothechatroom.Hestilldidn’tleavethechatroom,oraskmenottodoso.Isent3messagesinchatroom.Thechatroomnameisstill“DK”.On05/18/2023,Isentafewmessages.Thenameofthechatroomwasstill“DK”.Idon’trememberfromwhatexacttimeIchangednameto“DaiKang-SexualFraud”forafewminutes.IntotalIsent10messageswith2screenshots.AfterIreceivedandunderstoodtheprotectionorder.Iremovedeveryonefromthechatroom,anddidn’tcontacthimagain.(SeeExhibit40,47,31)
3)Hismangerreplied.(SeeExhibit47lastscreenshot)
c.Attemptedtoconnecttohisworkemailaddress,sentspamcallstothecompany'sChimeaccount,andattemptedtodisrupthiswork
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17
2)He“offwork2months”-howtodisrupthiswork?
19)MAY16,shethreatenedhimonhersocialmedia,stating,“Ineedcompensation”,“Ifyoudon'tanswermeorcometoseeme,Iwilltryallmeanstofindpeoplewhomightknowyou.“
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page1point5,d
2)Two“May16”,canorganizeintoone
3)Noevidenceof“threaten”,nointentionof“threaten”,thisisdefamation.Seehowpetitionerthreatenedme(SeeExhibit31)
4)Ididn’tsay“ifyoudon’tcometoseeme”,Ididn’tsay“Iwilltryallmeans”.ThisiscompletewrongandmisleadingtranslationfromChinesetoEnglish
5)“Ineedcompensation”,becausePetitionerpromisedmeon04/24/2023,thatI“couldbringanydemandtohim”duetohis7yearsliesandhurtingtome.(SeeExhibit31)
20)MAY17,
a.Called2times,sent18messages
b.Sent10messagesinChimechattingroom.Saidsamestuffasemailsandabusedhi
ResponsefromRespondent:
Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17
21)May18,called4times,sent22messages.Seeallthecalls&messagemotionedaboveinExhibit9(page14)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatthisagainasmentionedthisin“Page3point17
2)SeeExhibit40forcomprehensivestatistics
22)May18,theAnti-harassmentProtectionOrderwasdeliveredtoher
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)OnMay18,2023,intheafternoon,Ireceivedatextmessagefromapoliceofficer,mentioningacivilprotectionorderbutdidnotincludeanycontentoftheorder.Atthattime,Ididnotknowthemeaningofaprotectionorder.Irepliedpoliceat5:09PMpoliceaboutthenatureofprotectionorder
2)Andafterspendingwholeeveningonit,Istilldidn’tfullyunderstandit,duetomylimitedexperienceinAmerica,noneexperienceoflaw,andlanguagebarrier.Policerepliedmenextdaybutwithoutansweringmyquestionsabouttheorder.(SeeExhibit48,49)
3)Therefore,nextdayonMay19,2023,IcalledpolicetocometomyhometohelpmeunderstandwhatisprotectionorderandwhatIshoulddo.Iinvitedpolicetocheckmyphoneandlaptop.TwopoliceofficersconfirmedthatIdidn’tviolatetheorder.(SeeExhibit50)
4)Afterthat,Ididn’tcontactpetitioneranymore,asIalsodidn’twanttocontact
23)May18,shestartedtoVIOLATEtheorderanddisregardthecourtdocumentsinseveralways
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Ididn’tviolatetheorder.OnMay19,2023,IcalledpolicetocometomyhometohelpmeunderstandwhatisprotectionorderandwhatIshoulddo.Iinvitedpolicetocheckmyphoneandlaptop.TwopoliceofficersconfirmedthatIdidn’tviolatetheorder.(SeeExhibit50)
RefutingPage5Line20:
24)Respondentadmittedtocreatingaposttitled“Moveon“andclaimingtostop.However,itisimportanttonotethattheRespondentincludedaGoogleDrivelinkinthatpost,whichwasusedtoexposethePetitioner'sprivateaudiorecordings.ThisactionclearlydemonstratesthattheRespondentdidnotactuallymoveonbutinsteadstartedtheharassment
SeeExhibit10(page43)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Herethestatementand“Exhibit10(page43)aretotallydifferentstuff.Evidencedoesn’tsupportstatementatall
2)StatementRepeatedagainasalreadyrepeatedinpage1,6),a;inpage2,13),pleaserefertopreviousresponse
3)On04/24/2023,afterIwasinformedthatpetitionerliedtome“frombeginningtoend”inthepast7years,afterhethreatenedmeinvariousways,afterheusedmeagain,afterhepromisedto“continuouslyapologizetomeandlistentomydemands”,afterhechosenottofullfillhispromisetomyeitherdemand“calltoapologize”or“compensation”,from04/24/2023to05/01/2023,itindeedtookmesuchaLONGtimetoMOVEON,andIstillfailedtoMOVEON!IsowishedthatImovedonwithinONEDAYon04/24/2023!
4)Isowanttomoveon,butpetitionerdraggedmetolegalmatters,noletmemoveon!
5)Whydon’tpetitionermoveon?
6)Anyonecanhelpmemoveonquickly?IevenprayedforGodtohelpmemoveonon04/24/2023.(SeeExhibit51)
7)“startedharassment”-nottrue
8)On04/24/2023,afterPetitionercalledme,Ididn’trecordthecallinthebeginning.Afterhethreatenedmewithhisdeathataround3AM,whichmademeveryscared.Unknowninternetusersremindedmetorecordthecallasevidencetoprotectmyself.SoIrecordedtoprotectmyself.Hiscallwasfullofblames,threats,leis,beggingandmanipulation.Atthattime,Ididn’tknowthatIneedhisauthorizationtorecord,Iwastooscaredandexhaustedandjustwantedtoprotectmyself.Onewhohearsthecallwillknowhowhedeceivedme,blamedme,threatenedmeandmanipulatedme,willunderstandtheentirematter.However,untilIhiredattorney,IlearnedthatIneedopposingparty’sauthoritytorecordthecallinWA.Atthattime,Ijustwantedtoprotectmyself.Ineverexperiencedthisinmylife
9)Thecall/conversation/voiceisnotprivate,becausewhenhecalledme,hewasinahospital-apublicplace,andtherewerethirdpartiesspeaking,forexample,hiswifespokewithmeandhelpedhimlie,therewaspass-by’svoicesandhornsound
10)Anyonewhoseethispostisnotabletolistentoit,asit’sjustagooglelink,averylongandcomplicatedlink.Theconversationissavedinprivategooglelink
11)Thepurposeofthelinkistodefendmyselffromcountlessdisgustingdefamationonme,asunknowninternetuserssuggestedthosedefamationfromPetitioner,Petitioner’swifeortheirfriends.(SeeExhibit25,26)
12)Itoldpetitioneraboutthedefamation,butheignoredit
13)ToprotectPetitioner’sprivacy,Iremovedthepartthatincludes/coulddisclosePetitioner’spersonalinformationincludinghisname.Therefore,it’sonlyabout1.5hours,not3or4hoursashecalledme.(Petitionertooksexualphotoofmewithoutmyknowledgeandconsent!)
14)Thelinkdoesn’tworkwell.Anotherlinkisblank.(SeeExhibit27)
15)Thegooglelinkofourconversationworkedataroundnoontimeon05/01/2023,afewhourslater,Isetthepermissiontoprivate,sonoonecanlistentoit,asIwantedtomoveon.Ialsodeleteditlater.(SeeExhibit2
Page4
RefutingPage9Line4:
25)Respondentliedaboutherviolationoftheprotectionorder.Shesaidbeforeshewasserved,shemadeapostexpressingherconfusion,shock,andpain.However,inherposts,shewasquestioningwhyPetitionerstartedtheprotectionorderagainsther,whichmeanssheobviouslygottheprotectionorderbeforethepost’stimestampbutstillviolatedthem5times
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatedagainasalreadyrepeatedinpage3,23)
2)Ididn’tviolateorder.(SeeExhibit48,49,51)
3)Ididn’tlie.Ididn’tsay“Shesaidbeforeshewasserved,shemadeapost“,thisisthisreader’sintentionalwrongunderstandingbypickingpartoftheoriginalcontent,justlikehowreflectedinotheraccusationsand“evidence”.Inthefileof“response”,originalwordsare“AfterBeingServedoftheTemporaryProtectionOrder,sheHas
NeverKnowinglyorWillfullyViolatedtheOrder.”“allofherattemptstocontactPetitionerweremadebeforeshewasservedoftheorderandknewofthecontentandmeaningoftheorder.”
a.ContactinghimviaWeChatmessage
(Seeresponseto15-23,seeExhibit48,49,51)
b.ContactinghimviaChimemessage
(Seeresponseto15-23,seeExhibit48,49,51)
c.Contactingthethird-parties(MrDai’smanagers)thatmightknowhim
(Seeresponseto15-23,seeExhibit48,49,51)
d.PostingtheOrderandcourtdocumentsonhersocialmedia(LittleRedBook,thenencouragingpeopletoengageinnewinternetviolenceanddoxingagainstMr.Dai
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Noevidenceof“encouragingpeopletoengageinnewinternetviolenceanddoxingagainstMr.Dai”,alreadyrepeatedintheparagraphabove.Noevidenceforthis.Pleaserefertothecontentofmypost.(SeeyourownevidenceormyExhibit53.)
2)Postdoesnotincludehispersonalinformation.Instead,Ievenmarkedhisinformationtoprotecthisprivacy
3)ThepostwasbeforeIfullyunderstoodwhatisprotectionorder
4)Thedocumentispublicdocument
5)IfullyrespectedtocourtasIattendedhearingonsiteeverytime,whilepetitionerandpetitioner’sattorneyattendedonlineeverytimeanddoesn’twanttoshowfacetojudge
e.Creatingaposton,askinghimwhyheappliedforaprotectionorderagainsther
SeeExhibit11(page50)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Herethestatementand“Exhibit11(page50)aretotallydifferentstuff.Evidencedoesn’tsupportstatementatall
2)Abouttheposton.Ididn’tmeanto“askhim”,Imeanttoaskmyself,askGod,duetoeverythingIsufferedfromhim.Seecontent.(SeeExhibit54)
3)Thepostdidn’tincludehispersonalinformation
4)ThepostwasbeforeIfullyunderstoodwhatisprotectionorder
5)Onthesameday,atnight,Irequestedthewebsitetodeletemypost,butnotabletodoitduetowebsitepolice-“postwillnotdeleteifthepostdoesn’tcontainpersonalinformation”.Ievenreportedmyownpost,andaskedpeopletohelpmereportmypost,soitcanbeclosed.(SeeExhibit55)
RefutingPage12Line23:
26)Respondentliedaboutherposts.ShesaidshedidnotmentionanynameorprovideanyPetitioner’spersonalinformationnorengageinternetviolenceagainstPetitioner.However,thefactis:
a.ShepostedtwogoogledrivelinksandtwobaidudrivelinkswiththePetitionerprivateinformationincludingthenameinitialsandvoicerecord,resultedin38,480viewsand77comments.SeeExhibit12(page51)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatedagainasrepeatedinpage2,13),a,b;inpage3,24)
2)Thelinkdoesn’tincludehisnameorpersonalinformation.Evidencedoesn’tsupport
3)Noevidenceof“engageinternetviolenceagainstPetitioner”.Thisisdefamationonme
4)Thepurposeofthelinkistodefendmyselffromcountlessdisgustingdefamationonme,asunknowninternetuserssuggestedthosedefamationfromPetitioner,Petitioner’swifeortheirfriends.(SeeExhibit25,26)
5)ToprotectPetitioner’sprivacy,Iremovedthepartthatincludes/coulddisclosePetitioner’spersonalinformationincludinghisname.Therefore,it’sonlyabout1.5hours,not3or4hoursashecalledme.(Petitionertooksexualphotoofmewithoutmyknowledgeandconsent!)
6)Thecall/conversation/voiceisnotprivate,becausewhenhecalledme,hewasinahospital,andtherewerethirdpartiesspeaking,forexample,hiswifespokewithmeandhelpedhimlie,therewaspass-by’svoicesandhornsound
7)Thegooglelinkdoesn’tworkwell.Anotherlinkisblank.(SeeExhibit27)
8)Thegooglelinkofourconversationwaspublishedataroundnoontimeon05/01/2023,afewhourslater,Isetthepermissiontoprivate,sonoonecanlistentoit,asIwantedtomoveon.Ialsodeleteditlater.(SeeExhibit2
9)Twobaidulinksareblank,andcouldnotopen.(SeeExhibit56)
10)Therefore,“resultedin”isnottrue
RefutingPage13Line1:
27)Respondentliedaboutherlivestreamingactions.Shedeniesthesebehaviorsandsaidthereisnoevidenceprovethecontentoflivestreamnorcouldproveitevertookplace.Thefactisthat:
a.Thelivestreamlastedfor1hours45minutes
b.Latershealsouploadedtherecordofthelivestreamtohersocialmedia.Mr.Daihavethefullrecordofthelivestream.SeeExhibit13(page52)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Samepoint,repeated6times
2)Ididn’ttrytolivestream.IjusttriedtouseHimalayatoconvertvoiceintotext,asHimalayaistheonlytoolIknowthatcouldconvertvoiceintotext.Whiletryingthisfunction,itwasautomaticallyuploaded/“published”beforelunchtimeon05/18/2023,whileIdidn’tknow.YoucancheckwithHimalayaaboutthisfunction.AfterIsawit“published”,Iimmediatelydeletedit.IdeletedbeforeIreceivedtheprotectionorder.Ihavenopost/contentonHimalaya.(SeeExhibit57)
3)Ireturnedtherecordingtopetitioneralready
4)Petitioner’sevidenceshowedthathealsorecordedmyvoicewithoutmyauthorization
Page5
RefutingPage13Line1:
28)Respondentsaidthereisnoevidenceforhateorthreat.However,seebelowevidence:
a.InWeChat,shesaid12times“Ihateyou”
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Pleaserefertoentireconversationon04/24/2023,especiallypetitioner’sdeaththreats.(SeeExhibit31)
2)On03/22/2023,duetoIsuggestedbreakup,andduetootherarguments,Petitionersaid“Ihateyou”tome.Ialsosaiditback.Afterthat,petitionerstilldiscussedhowtoimproveourrelationship.On03/26/2023,hesaid“Itriedallmeanstorecoverourrelationship,andyoupushedmeawayagainandagain.”On03/28/2023,hesaid“Iwokeupthismorningthinkinghowtoimproverelationshipwithyou”Sopleaseaskpetitionerwhat“Ihateyou”meanstohim.(SeeExhibit5
b.Forthethreat,shesaid
i.“IwillgettothemajorforumsandplatformstoexposeyournamedirectlyifIwant”
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Whereistheevidence?
2)Ididn’tsayit
3)Showthecompletecontent.TranslatecorrectlyfromChinesetoEnglish
ii.“Ifyoudon'tanswermeorcometoseeme,Iwilltryallmeanstofindpeoplewhomightknowyou“
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Repeatedagainasalreadyrepeatedin5)d,19)
2)Ididn’tsay“ifyoudon’tcometoseeme”or“tryallmeans”,thisisintentionalwrongtranslationfromChinesetoEnglishtomislead
c.“Yoursubscriberswillbeinterestedinyourprivacy.”SeeExhibit14(page53)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)“Exhibit14onpage53doesn’treflectstatementatall
2)IassumeyoumeanthelastscreenshotonyourExhibit3,ifso,thetranslationofChinesemeans”Ppleasesolvetheproblemwell,yourfollowerscametocontactmeandaskaboutyourpersonallife.”(andIdidn’treplytotheirquestion.)
RefutingPage14Line1:
a.Respondentsaidshepostedherlovestoryonlyonce,however,shepostedmorethan30timestitledwithlovestory1–26,withatleasttwoseparateaccounts.SeeExhibit15(page54)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)“once”meansonecontinuoustime,asLittleRedBookdoesn’tallowmetopostalltextinonepost,soIhadtopostinmultipletimes.Ihad25postswithcontent.Post26hasnocontent.Pleasestopintentionalmisunderstanding
2)Becausemyfirstaccountwasfrozen,soIhadtousesecondaccount
3)It’smyfreedomtousemysocialmediaaccountstowritemystory,andit’sanonymousstory,withgoodintentiontoprotectparties’privacy
RefutingPage17Line14:
29)RespondentdeniedherStalkingorCyberstalkingPetitioner.SeetheExhibit3(page9)
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Exhibit3onpage9doesn’tshowthatI“stalk”or“cyberstalking”petitioner
2)Petitionercyberstalkedmewithsecretaccountsonsocialmedia.(SeeExhibit59)
3)Petitionersenthisfollowerstocyberstalkme
4)Petitionersenthisfollowerstocyberstalkme
5)Petitionerusedtosendmehundredsofmessagesaday.Petitionersentmeover700messagesonSkypeandWeChatonJanuary3,2023;about200mesagesonMarch22,2023;over1300messagesinthreedaysfromMarch26toMarch28,2023
RefutingPage19Line20:
30)Respondentthinkthereisnoneedtoissueafullordergiveshehavepostedtitled“Moveon”onMay1,2023.However,shestilldidn’tstoptheharassmentactionsandescalateditafterMay14,sheevenviolatedthetemporaryprotectionorder5times.So,theFullOrderisstillrequiredtoprotectthepetitionerandhisfamily
ResponsefromRespondent:
1)Excuseme,youwanttodecideformewhenIcanmoveon?Doyoupaymymedicalandtherapycosttohelpmemoveon?Haveyoubeendeceivedandmanipulatedandhurtfor7years?Haveyoubeenthreatenedwithdeath?Haveyousufferedseveredepression,anxietyandPTSD?Duetopetitioner’sbehaviors,Imaynotbeabletohavechildanymore!
2)Ashereyouagreedthatmyposton05/01/2023isabout“MoveOn”,whyyouquestionmenotmoveon?Whatisthelogic?
3)“Post”,“May14”,“order”,Repeatthesamepointsagainandagain
4)“harassment”isdefamationonme
5)Ididn’tviolatetheorder.(SeeExhibit50)
6)On05/01/2023,policetoldpetitionerthatmyposthasnothreats.On05/15/2023,policetoldpetitionerhecanblockmyphone.However,hemanipulatedme,police,courtandjudgeforhispurposeofprivaterevenge
7)DuetoallevidenceIprovided,afullDomesticViolenceandanti-harassmentOrderisrequiredtoprotectme